Past perfect
More reading on neo-classical economics.
It was invented in the 1870s but is still at the heart of mainstream economics.
It’s probably more fundamental to the resurgence so-called free-market
capitalism from the 1970s than “neo-liberalism”, the corresponding global political
project. Especially, I’m anxious not to do a hatchet-job on neo-classicism that
skates over the power behind its enduring appeal, despite some of its well-known obvious
drawbacks.
On this, I was thinking yesterday about the
idea of perfect competition, and what an amazing tool for wealth-creation—as the
basis for universal human freedom—and a severe check on capitalist excess, it
would be, if it were not a mostly unattainable ideal-type. It’s a
transcendental dream of freedom and democracy of a sort.
(Perfect competition describes a situation
in which many small firms without price-setting power compete to sell interchangeable
products, achieving just enough profits to sustain the industry to meet
consumer desires. It’s the core theoretical market structure of the neo-classical paradigm, on which its peculiar picture of dynamism and continuously re-attained
stability go hand in hand.)
Comments
Post a Comment